In Union County, South Carolina, the cotton mills that once sustained the economy and offered jobs have vanished over time. Today, this area is designated as a «food desert,» indicating that numerous inhabitants reside a considerable distance from the nearest supermarket. Observing this problem, community non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated a project in 2016. She partnered with local farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruit and vegetables across the county, which has a demographic where nearly 30% of the population is Black and approximately 25% are living below the poverty line.
At first, Ms. Ashby financed the project using her own savings and minor grants. But in 2023, her work gained substantial support as the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of one of the country’s largest companies—awarded her organization more than $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was included in a larger $1.5 million initiative designed to assist «community-based non-profits led by people of color.»
«It brought me to tears,» she confessed. «It was one of those instances when you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates your efforts.»
Just two years ago, programs like this were widely backed by major corporations across the U.S., as the country reckoned with systemic racism following the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black man who died under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer.
Nonetheless, numerous corporations are now withdrawing from these pledges. In November, Walmart revealed the cessation of certain diversity programs, which includes the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, a key player in funding the grant received by Ms. Ashby.
Firms like Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have undertaken comparable actions, highlighting a more extensive corporate retraction from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.
This transition signifies a significant cultural change, influenced partly by concerns about legal disputes, regulatory oversight, and backlash on social media—pressures intensified by the current U.S. president.
Since assuming office in January, Donald Trump has vigorously attempted to dismantle DEI programs, promoting a revival of «merit-based opportunity» within the United States. He has directed the federal government to abolish DEI initiatives and commence inquiries into private companies and educational establishments suspected of participating in «illegal DEI practices.»
During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put nearly 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump removed the nation’s leading military general—a Black man—following prior recommendations from his defense secretary for his removal due to his connection with «woke» DEI policies.
At first sight, it might appear that the U.S. has forsaken efforts to better outcomes for racial and identity groups historically marginalized. However, some specialists propose that these efforts might continue, perhaps under alternative names that better align with the evolving political environment of a country that has recently elected a leader devoted to opposing «woke» policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
Initiatives similar to DEI first gained traction in the U.S. during the 1960s, in reaction to the civil rights movement, which aimed to extend and safeguard the rights of Black Americans.
Initially framed under terms such as «affirmative action» and «equal opportunity,» these initiatives aimed to counteract the long-standing consequences of slavery and the systemic discrimination enforced under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements evolved to encompass women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the terminology surrounding these efforts broadened to include «diversity,» «equity,» and «inclusion.»
Within businesses and government institutions, DEI efforts primarily targeted hiring strategies that portrayed diversity as a financial benefit. Supporters contend that these programs tackle inequalities across different communities, though a significant focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The push for DEI surged in 2020 amid the Black Lives Matter protests and increasing demands for social change. Walmart, for instance, pledged $100 million over five years to establish its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo appointed its first chief diversity officer, while companies like Google and Nike already had similar leadership roles in place. Following these changes, S&P 100 companies created over 300,000 new jobs, with 94% of them going to people of color, according to Bloomberg.
Nonetheless, as rapidly as these initiatives grew, a conservative backlash arose.
Stefan Padfield, the executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, contends that DEI programs inherently separate individuals based on racial and gender differences.
Recently, detractors have amplified their assertions that DEI initiatives—originally crafted to fight discrimination—are themselves prejudiced, especially against white Americans. Training programs that emphasize «white privilege» and systemic racial prejudice have faced significant criticism.
The foundation of this opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic concept positing that racism is intricately woven into American society. Gradually, efforts opposing CRT in education broadened into wider campaigns aiming to penalize «woke corporations.»
Online platforms like End Wokeness and conservative personalities such as Robby Starbuck have leveraged this feeling, directing attention to companies for their DEI efforts. Starbuck has taken credit for changes in policy at firms like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after revealing their DEI programs to his audience on social media.
A major and visible achievement for this movement occurred in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for teaming up with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. The resulting calls to boycott the brand and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, according to a Harvard Business Review analysis.
Another significant milestone occurred in June 2023, when the Supreme Court decided that race could no longer be considered in university admissions, effectively ending decades of affirmative action policies.
This decision cast doubt on the legal standing of corporate DEI policies. Following the ruling, Meta informed employees that «the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,» just before announcing the cancellation of its own DEI programs.
Corporate Retreat: A Question of Authenticity
The swift reversal of DEI programs by major corporations prompts questions about the genuineness of their pledges to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit conducting surveys on workplace issues—suggests that numerous companies initially adopted DEI initiatives to «appear favorable» following the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than from an authentic commitment to change.
Nonetheless, not all companies are yielding to political and legal pressure. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation noted that while DEI programs appear to be in decline, «nearly all» Fortune 500 companies still include DEI commitments somewhere in their official statements. Additionally, Apple shareholders recently voted to maintain the company’s diversity initiatives.
Public sentiment on DEI is split. A survey by JUST Capital indicates that backing for DEI has diminished, but support for related matters—such as equitable pay—remains robust. In parallel, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey discovered that a majority (56%) of working adults still perceive workplace DEI efforts as advantageous.
